Hebrews 10:26-31 and the Possibility of Apostasy
- Sam Storms
- Nov 7, 2006
- Series: Eternal Security
Here our author describes someone as
continuing in willful sin after having “received the knowledge of the truth.”
The latter need mean no more than that they have heard and understood the gospel
and have given mental assent or agreement to it. Tragically, many people hear
the good news and commit themselves to shape their lives by the ethics of Jesus
and in accordance with the standards and life of a local church while never
experiencing regeneration and placing their personal trust in Christ for
salvation. They then turn from what they have heard and understood and openly
and defiantly repudiate it as false. There are unsaved theologians and biblical
commentators whose “knowledge of the truth” of Christianity, at least in terms
of objective data, is more extensive and insightful than that held by some true
believers. In this regard, see 2 Peter 2:20-21.
But the troubling phrase in this passage
is in v. 29 where this person is said to have regarded as unclean “the blood of
the covenant by which he was sanctified.” Does this mean a genuine Christian is
in view? Those who affirm eternal security have pointed to one of two possible
interpretations:
First,
some have suggested that the “he” who is sanctified is actually Jesus Christ,
not the apostate. This is grammatically possible. It is also theologically
possible, as John 17:19 speaks of Jesus “sanctifying” himself. We must remember
that “to sanctify” can mean “to set apart for a special purpose or use” without
the notion of sin being involved. See also similar language and thought in Heb.
2:10; 5:7,9; and 9:11-12. Noel Weeks argues that
“the whole point of the author has been
to emphasize that Jesus has fulfilled the requirements of a High Priest. There
is an analogy between the Aaronic ordinances and the sacrifice of Christ. So it
is reasonable to suggest that as Aaron was consecrated by the blood of the
sacrifice (Ex. 29), so Jesus was consecrated as High Priest through the offering
of His own blood” (WTJ, 39 [Fall 1976],
80).
Second, Wayne Grudem and others contend
that “the word sanctified need not refer to the internal moral
purification that comes with salvation, for the term hagiazo has a broader range than that, both in
Hebrews and in the New Testament generally” (177). Grudem points to Heb. 9:13 as
an example where the word refers to rendering someone ceremonially clean but not
necessarily spiritually (or savingly) clean. See also 1 Cor. 7:14; Matthew
23:17,19; 1 Timothy 4:5. The context in Hebrews 10 appears to support this view,
as our author is concerned with parallels between the OT Levitical sacrifice and
the better new covenant sacrifice of Christ. Says Grudem:
“the author of Hebrews knows that some
may fall away, even though they assemble with the congregation of
believers and so share
in this great privilege of coming before God [see 10:19-22]. So he says, ‘not
neglecting to meet together, as is the habit of some, but encouraging one
another’ (10:25). The reason to encourage one another is the warning in 10:26,
‘For if we sin deliberately after receiving the knowledge of the truth.’ In such
a context, it is appropriate to understand ‘profaned the blood of the covenant
by which he was sanctified’ to mean ‘by which he was given the
privilege of coming before God with the congregation of God’s
people.’ In this sense,
the blood of Christ opened up a new way of access to God for the congregation –
it ‘sanctified’ them in a parallel to the Old Testament ceremonial sense – and
this person, by associating with the congregation, was also ‘sanctified’ in that
sense: He or she had the privilege of coming before God in worship”
(178).
Someone who has experienced that awesome
opportunity and privilege only then to willfully repudiate the person and work
of Christ through whom it was made possible can expect only judgment. Consistent
with this, our author then proceeds to distinguish between two groups in 10:39.
There are, on the one hand, those who do not have saving faith and thus
eventually fall away (“shrink back”) into destruction. On the other hand, there
are those who have saving faith and thus persevere to the preserving of the
soul. He doesn’t envision a third group: those who have saving faith and later
fall away.